GLP-2

Glepaglutide: one trial, two regulators, two answers

The same phase 3 trial was judged differently in Washington and Amsterdam. The FDA asked for another study. The EMA committee recommended approval.

15 October 2026 6 min read Editorial policy

Glepaglutide is a long-acting GLP-2 analogue developed by Zealand Pharma in Copenhagen for short bowel syndrome. It is given as a 10 mg injection under the skin, and the goal is to replace the daily injection of teduglutide with a twice weekly one. In Europe it will be sold as Zeydovio if the European Commission confirms the EMA's recommendation. In the United States it is not approved.

The pivotal trial: EASE-1

EASE SBS 1 was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. It enrolled adults with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure who needed parenteral support at least three days a week, and randomised them 1:1:1 to glepaglutide 10 mg twice weekly, glepaglutide 10 mg once weekly, or placebo for 24 weeks. As in other trials in this field, intravenous support was reduced whenever 48-hour urine volume rose more than 10% above baseline. The results were published in Gastroenterology in April 2025.

PS = parenteral support (intravenous nutrition and fluid).
TrialYear, journalnDurationDrug and dosePrimary result vs comparator
EASE-1, twice weekly arm2025, Gastroenterology106 across 3 arms24 weeksGlepaglutide 10 mg twice weekly vs placeboPS volume: down 5.13 vs 2.85 L/week (P = .0039)
Same trial, respondersWeeks 20 and 24Twice weekly vs placebo20% or more PS cut: 65.7% vs 38.9% (P = .0243)
Same trial, days offWeek 24Twice weekly vs placeboAt least 1 fewer PS day a week: 51.4% vs 19.4% (P = .0043)
Same trial, weaningWeek 24Twice weekly vs placeboOff PS entirely: 5 patients (14%) vs 0
EASE-1, once weekly arm24 weeksGlepaglutide 10 mg once weekly vs placeboNo statistically significant difference on primary or key secondary endpoints

Two things stand out. The twice weekly dose worked on every main measure. The once weekly dose did not separate from placebo. That split is what the US decision turned on.

The rest of the EASE programme

EASE-1 did not stand alone. Zealand ran a phase 2 study and three further phase 3 studies, listed here with the numbers from their ClinicalTrials.gov records.

StudyTypenDurationPrimary outcome
Phase 2 (ZP1848)Phase 2183 week treatment periodsChange in wet weight of stoma output or diarrhoea
EASE SBS 1Phase 3, placebo-controlled10624 weeksChange in weekly PS volume
EASE SBS 2Phase 3 extension1502 yearsAdverse events
EASE SBS 3Phase 3 extension84108 weeksAdverse events
EASE SBS 4Phase 3 mechanistic1224 weeksChange in absorption of wet weight and fluids
EASE SBS 5Phase 3, placebo-controlled, confirmatory90 planned24 week primary, then open-labelChange in weekly PS volume

The extension and mechanistic studies are open-label or small. They inform long-term safety and how the drug works, not whether it beats placebo.

The FDA: a complete response letter

On 19 December 2024 Zealand announced that the FDA had issued a complete response letter, its formal way of declining to approve an application as submitted. The FDA said the application did not provide substantial evidence of efficacy and safety for the to-be-marketed dose, and recommended an additional clinical trial to confirm it. The application rested on a single pivotal trial in which only one of two dosing arms succeeded.

The answer: EASE-5

EASE SBS 5 is the confirmatory trial. According to its ClinicalTrials.gov record, it is a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of glepaglutide 10 mg twice weekly in about 90 adults with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure, followed by a long-term open-label safety period. Its primary endpoint is the change in weekly parenteral support volume from baseline to week 24. The record lists a start in February 2026, status recruiting, and an estimated primary completion in October 2028. A US resubmission would follow results.

The EMA: a positive opinion

Zealand submitted a marketing authorisation application to the EMA in June 2025, based on EASE-1 plus interim data from the EASE-2 and EASE-3 extension trials and the EASE-4 mechanistic trial. On 17 September 2026 the EMA's human medicines committee (CHMP) adopted a positive opinion recommending authorisation of Zeydovio as a 10 mg solution in a pre-filled pen. The recommended indication is adults with short bowel syndrome who are stable after a period of intestinal adaptation following surgery. EMA's summary describes the evidence as a larger reduction in weekly parenteral support volume with twice weekly glepaglutide than placebo over 24 weeks.

A CHMP opinion is a recommendation. The legal authorisation comes from the European Commission, usually within about two months. At the time of writing, EMA's page still says the product information will be published once the Commission grants authorisation.

Side effects

EMA lists the most common side effects as injection site reactions, stoma complications in people with a stoma, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea, fluid retention or overload, and vomiting. That profile overlaps closely with teduglutide's, which is expected from a drug acting on the same receptor. The full EU label with any monitoring requirements, such as colonoscopy timing, will be in the summary of product characteristics once it is published.

How it compares

Different trials, populations and endpoints. Not a head-to-head comparison.
DrugInjectionStatus (October 2026)Pivotal headline
Teduglutide (Gattex, Revestive)Once dailyApproved US and EU since 2012STEPS: 63% vs 30% responders
Glepaglutide (Zeydovio)Twice weeklyEU: CHMP positive opinion Sept 2026. US: not approved, confirmatory trial runningEASE-1: 65.7% vs 38.9% responders
ApraglutideOnce weeklyNot approved; confirmatory STARS-2 trial runningSTARS: PS volume down 25.5% vs 12.5%

The responder rates look similar across teduglutide and glepaglutide, but the placebo groups differed (30% vs 38.9%) and so did the patients and weaning rules. Only a head-to-head trial could rank them, and none exists. The apraglutide page covers the once weekly competitor.

What to log

A twice weekly injection is easier to miss than a daily one. Peptide AI's dose log and protocol planner track scheduled days, with site rotation and bloodwork on the same timeline for clinic reviews.

Questions people ask

Is glepaglutide approved?

Not yet anywhere. The FDA issued a complete response letter in December 2024. In the EU, the EMA committee recommended approval of Zeydovio on 17 September 2026; the European Commission makes the final decision.

How well did glepaglutide work in EASE-1?

At 10 mg twice weekly, weekly parenteral support fell 5.13 litres vs 2.85 litres on placebo over 24 weeks, and 65.7% vs 38.9% were responders. Once weekly dosing did not beat placebo.

Why did the FDA reject glepaglutide?

The FDA said the application lacked substantial evidence of efficacy and safety for the to-be-marketed dose and asked for another trial. The application relied on one phase 3 trial where only the twice weekly arm succeeded.

What is EASE-5?

The confirmatory phase 3 trial of glepaglutide 10 mg twice weekly vs placebo in about 90 adults, with a 24 week primary endpoint. It started in February 2026 with primary completion estimated in October 2028.

How is glepaglutide different from teduglutide?

Both act on the GLP-2 receptor. Teduglutide is injected daily; glepaglutide is long-acting and injected twice weekly at a fixed 10 mg dose. There is no head-to-head trial.

Free on iOS and Android

Log it once. See it all on one timeline.

Doses, food, training, labs, sleep and scans on one timeline. On iOS and Android.

The PeptideAI protocol screen with a weekly GLP-1 dose on it.