Surrogate endpoint
A measurement that stands in for the outcome people actually care about. Usually faster and cheaper to measure. Occasionally, badly wrong.
A clinical outcome is something a person feels or experiences: a heart attack, a fracture, death, being able to climb stairs. A surrogate endpoint is a marker expected to predict one of those. US law, quoted on the FDA's surrogate endpoint table, describes it as "a marker, such as a laboratory measurement, radiographic image, physical sign, or other measure" that is "not itself a direct measurement of clinical benefit".
Surrogates make trials possible. Waiting for heart attacks takes thousands of people and years; a change in LDL cholesterol shows within weeks.
Surrogates that support approval
The FDA lists the surrogates it has accepted. Some are rated as known to predict clinical benefit, which supports traditional approval. Others are only "reasonably likely" to, which supports accelerated approval with a requirement to confirm later.
| Condition | Surrogate | Type of approval on the FDA table |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 and type 2 diabetes | HbA1c | Traditional |
| High cholesterol | LDL cholesterol | Traditional |
| High blood pressure | Blood pressure | Traditional |
Weight loss drugs are approved on weight change, which is not on that table. Whether a given amount of weight loss reduces heart attacks was an open question until outcome trials answered it.
When surrogates misled
CAST, 1989. Irregular heartbeats after a heart attack predict sudden death, so drugs that suppressed them looked promising. In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, encainide and flecainide suppressed the arrhythmia, but total deaths were 56 of 730 (7.7 percent) on the drugs against 22 of 725 (3.0 percent) on placebo. That arm was stopped.
Torcetrapib, 2007. Higher HDL cholesterol is associated with lower heart risk. Torcetrapib raised HDL by 72.1 percent and lowered LDL by 24.9 percent at 12 months, and increased cardiovascular events (HR 1.25) and death from any cause (HR 1.58) in the ILLUMINATE trial of 15,067 people.
In both cases the marker moved in the right direction and the outcome moved in the wrong one. A drug can change a marker through a route that does not lead where the marker usually leads.
Where GLP-1 drugs stand
The GLP-1 drugs were approved for diabetes on HbA1c and for weight on weight change. Outcome trials have since tested the clinical events directly. SELECT found semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced major cardiovascular events (HR 0.80) in people with heart disease and obesity, and FLOW found semaglutide 1 mg reduced major kidney events (HR 0.76) in type 2 diabetes with kidney disease. That is the surrogate being checked against the outcome, which is how it should work.
For most research peptides, the evidence is a surrogate at best, often in animals. A change in a marker such as IGF-1 or hs-CRP is a reason to ask about outcomes, not an answer. The longevity markers page covers what common markers do and do not predict.
Your own labs are surrogates too, and they are still worth tracking. The bloodwork tracking feature reads markers such as HbA1c, LDL, triglycerides and hs-CRP from a lab PDF and plots them against your dose timeline.
Related terms: hazard ratio, clinical trial phases, insulin resistance, placebo-controlled trial. Back to the glossary.
Questions people ask
What is a surrogate endpoint?
A marker, such as a lab value or blood pressure, used in place of a clinical outcome such as heart attack or death because it is expected to predict it.
Is HbA1c a surrogate endpoint?
Yes. The FDA lists HbA1c as a surrogate that has supported traditional approval of drugs for type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Can a surrogate endpoint be misleading?
Yes. In CAST, drugs that suppressed arrhythmias raised deaths to 7.7 percent from 3.0 percent on placebo. Torcetrapib raised HDL by 72.1 percent and increased deaths (HR 1.58).
Have GLP-1 drugs been tested on real outcomes?
Yes. SELECT showed semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced major cardiovascular events (HR 0.80), and FLOW showed semaglutide 1 mg reduced major kidney events (HR 0.76).
Sources
- Table of surrogate endpoints that were the basis of drug approval or licensure, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource, FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group
- Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction (CAST), New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events (ILLUMINATE), New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in obesity without diabetes (SELECT), New England Journal of Medicine, 2023
- Effects of semaglutide on chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (FLOW), New England Journal of Medicine, 2024
